Markus Hofmeyr's Takeaways from a Recent Rewilding Workshop

Markus Hofmeyr's Takeaways from a Recent Rewilding Workshop

Rafael Abuin

By Markus Hofmeyr, Director of the Rhino Recovery Fund

Last month, I was invited to give a presentation at the First Global Meeting of Conservation Translocation Practitioners Workshop, which focused on identifying and communicating best practices for wildlife reintroduction programs across different continents and cultures. This event was held in Valencia, Spain.

This workshop featured a speaker talking about translocations from each continent. This diverse gathering featured a wide array of viewpoints on wildlife reintroductions, which led to some fascinating discussions. It was great to see what my peers are doing to advance and fine-tune rewilding and similar conservation actions at a global scale. I was honored to speak on behalf of Africa about translocation strategies I've helped implement, and was joined by Simon Naylor from Munyawana Game Reserve in South Africa and Marc Stahlmans from the Gorongosa National Park restoration project in Mozambique.

Giving my presentation at the workshop in Spain.

Rafael Abuin

It is clear that strategies for rewilding, and keeping wildlife in the wild, are quite advanced in Africa when compared to some other parts of the world. This is due to the scale that Africa has managed to carry out these reintroductions, translating to hundreds of thousands of animals moved—often entire trophic levels of large mammals restored in certain wild places. Our portfolio remains the best example of conservation investments, with large areas of formerly barren land completely restored with wildlife numbers and species variety, often in short periods of time. I was also impressed by some of the incredible work done by Australia and some oceanic islands to aid the recovery of native species after non-native predators were introduced or habitat change had caused havoc in the ecosystem.

The most challenging places for translocation and rewilding approaches are Europe, North America, and South America due to policy challenges and a lack of scalable examples. From my own experience, Southeast Asia also has many complexities due to high human population density and minimal translocation experience, making wildlife reintroductions tricky to pull off there.

India presented an interesting case study—despite large challenges from urban development and a growing human population, the country is showing some significant and innovative examples of coexistence. Their wildlife corridor models are working well, as is a successful voluntary movement program where people willingly relocate out of core conservation areas.

The largest population of greater one-horned rhinos lives in the Indian state of Assam.

There were so many wonderful presentations and suggestions offered at this workshop, but the best summary that I saw from all of these lessons came from a Mexican biologist working on restoration projects in the Indian Ocean and Pacific Islands. A summary of his points are as follows:

  • Beware of experts, as they often disagree and egos can get in the way of rational decisions.
  • A small, well-managed team of amateurs can achieve more than a group experts.
  • The best translocation project is the one you started talking about 10 years ago and implementing now—properly sequenced translocations take time to establish and therefore need realistic planning periods.
  • Do not wait for science to address everyone’s concerns—such solutions don’t exist. It will take too long to satisfy every scientific question around translocations.
  • If the library is burning, don’t waste time counting books!
  • Sometimes translocation are not the answer—some landscapes are too compromised to allow for certain translocations to ever truly become long-term successes.
  • Some systems are better suited for conservation translocations than others—certain landscapes will have a better chance than others to successfully recover wildlife. If the socio-ecological environment is not well aligned, it will usually fail.
  • Experts do not own endangered species.
  • Fear of public opinion can sink a project.
  • Nobody benefits from hiding mistakes.
  • Academic publishing can sometimes hinder knowledge sharing—sometimes the "publish or perish" drive withholds information needed to make the best decisions, so share information freely.
  • People and have short and selective memory, so failures can be repeated if lessons learned aren't properly documented.
  • Indigenous knowledge and experiences and local capacity building and inclusion are crucial to the long-term success of translocation projects.

Myself and the entire group of presenters at the translocation workshop.

Rafael Abuin

My own take-home message is that we are well ahead of the curve in Africa, but for us to remain on that positive trajectory, we have to accelerate wildlife reintroductions into conservation areas through new, sustainable models to break the dependence, agendas, and politics of large NGOs and bilateral funders. Projects need to be locally managed from the bottom-up, and they must rewrite the narrative to allow these natural-based solutions to be accepted as development drivers that lead to a sustainable and thriving local economy. Translocation is a step down the line in this process and should not be the primary driver in early stages. Before conservation translocations occur, we must remove the original causes of wildlife loss, ensure habitat safety and restoration, and have risk mitigation plans in place to ensure the success of a rewilding process. This often takes time.

It was a privilege to take part in this incredible and informative workshop, and to represent Africa among this gathering of amazing conservationists. These types of global cross-learning experiences are excellent for sharing and advancing conservation strategies that are critical to our mission to make wild places safe, thriving homes for wildlife again.